The MCBA evaluates candidates in six categories that are important to being a good judge – experience, legal analysis, judicial temperament and demeanor, ethics and integrity, communication skills and sensitivity to discrimination.

The evaluation process balances two elements that combine to provide a thorough and impartial evaluation.

 Evaluation by peers. A survey, representing a cross-section of the legal community, is a key element of the evaluation process. This year, 388 lawyers and judges who have regular professional contact with at least one of the persons being evaluated participated in the survey. The survey was completed electronically through third-party vendor Metrix Matrix, and paper evaluations were made available for those without access to a computer.

  In-depth interviews and research. The Bar Association’s judiciary committee conducted an in depth interview and research process, including analysis of legal writings and reference checks, along with interviews of peers and adversaries. The committee is composed of 27 voting members, who are diverse in race, gender, political affiliation and areas of practice expertise.